Three days after,the Delhi High Court Bar Association called the abstention from the work, on Monday, The Delhi High Court termed the recent attacks on properties of three advocates as “startling” and sought action taken report from the Delhi Police on the issue.
A bench of Acting Chief Justice Gita Mittal and Justice C Hari Shankar directed that the report should be lodged under the signature of a senior police officer, which shall be indicated to the Delhi Police commissioner.
It directed that the report should be filed in two days as the incident warrants swift and necessary action.“It is a subject of deep pain as the incidents could have caused loss to the life and property of the lawyers,” the bench said, while expressing anguish over delay in digging into the incidents.It said, “The incidents were startling and worrying as these happened to lawyers who defend the litigants.”
The court’ direction came while initiating the proceeding on its own after taking note of the fact that lawyers abstained from the work on January 25 in view of the onsets.The executive committee of the Delhi High Court Bar Association (DHCBA) held on January 24 passed a resolution condemning the January 9 and 22 attacks on the properties and cars of senior advocates Vikas Pahwa and Kirti Uppal, who is also the president of the DHCBA, by using inflammable substances.
A similar incident took place on January 4 when the two cars– a Maruti Swift and a Honda Amaze– parked in the east Delhi house of advocate Ravi Sharma were allegedly torched by unknown individuals.
Separate FIRs have been filed by the Delhi Police, which articulated the three lawyers were representing a woman colleague in the Delhi High Court in a property dispute with her relatives.The woman lawyer, against whom a stalking case was lodged, was also allegedly dragged out of her residence by the police to arrest her despite court orders against coercive action.
Granting to the police, attempts to set ablaze Advocate Pahwa’s Greater Kailash office building and cars were formed on January 9.On January 22, Advocate KirtiUppal’s Hyundai Tucson car that was parked outside his house in south Delhi’s Nizamuddin West, was set on fire by unidentified sources.
Meanwhile, a plea has been moved before the high court seeking a court-monitored SIT probe into the attacks on the lawyers, besides guidelines for advocates’ security.
Besides this, Advocate KirtiUppal, in his interview with INBA officials has also expressed his views regarding introduction of Lawyer’s Safety Act in the Capital City like other states.
By: Tushar Solanki, Co-Convener, Reporters Committee, INBA
Genre: NewsSC Seeks Centre’s View On Plea To Exclude Creamy Layer Among SC/ST From Reservation Benefits
Genre: Top StoriesLitigant Complains To Rohini Court District Judge After Being Served Stale Food In Court CafeteriaSC Seeks Centre’s View On Plea To Exclude Creamy Layer Among SC/ST From Reservation BenefitsSC restrained NIA to go into validity of Hadiya & Shafin’s Marriage